SGIA Held a Civil Political Dialogue Event
KENNESAW, Ga. | Apr 30, 2026
KSU students gathered Wednesday, April 29, for a discussion on political extremism, violence, and civility featuring two Georgia lawmakers from opposing political parties.
SGIA hosted the Civil Political Dialogue in the Academic Learning Center, bringing together State Rep. Lisa Campbell, a Democrat, and State Sen. Ed Setzler, a Republican as panelists. Former Republican State Sen. Don Balfour and KSU political science professor Dr. Eric Castater moderated the discussion, attended by about 40 students. The panel examined the causes of political extremism and violence, the responsibilities of elected officials, and how political leaders can model constructive disagreement.
Representative Campbell shared, “Civility means practicing sustained respect and compassion, not just politeness. It includes welcoming diverse perspectives, listening actively, managing emotions, honoring dignity, and showing kindness amid disagreement” Senator Setzler added, “The panel made it clear to me that the rise of violence on the political right and left in our country emanates from the shocking rise in nihilism, the belief that there is no Truth and that nothing in this life truly matters. Every human being is made in the image of their creator and thus has timeless value. Remembering this, which makes America unique, is the path that will lead our nation back from political violence”.
For students, the event offered an opportunity to observe political disagreement without partisan attacks.
“One of the things that I really enjoyed from this dialogue for the start was clear on language. The dialogue was meant not to attack each other but to get a clear understanding of what they stood on. It also allowed them to get a better understanding on why they may think their way is better,” said Melanie Alfaro, a senior majoring in International Affairs at KSU.
After the formal discussion, Representative Campbell and Senator Setzler remained on campus for more than an hour to answer questions and speak with students individually and in small groups. For students, the conversation offered more than a chance to hear opposing viewpoints, but rather it provided a firsthand look at how political disagreement can remain in a constructive conversation rather than become a conflict.
