Research Agenda
The National Hybrid Schools Project is dedicated to documenting, analyzing, and elevating the diverse educational models emerging beyond traditional school systems. Through original research, national surveys, case studies, and data analysis, we seek to identify trends, understand promising practices, and provide meaningful insights into the growth and evolution of hybrid and microschools. The goal is to provide reliable evidence that informs educators, researchers, policymakers, and families while contributing to the broader conversation about the future of K–12 education.
Refereed Papers
- Wearne, E. (2025). “A Preliminary Survey of Classical Hybrid Schools.” Faith & Economics 85 (2).
- Wearne, E. (2025). ‘A Public Economy Approach to Education: School Choice and Co-production’ Revisited. Journal of Institutional Economics, 21, e25.
- Lee, M. H., Thompson, J., & Wearne, E. (2025). How Do Hybrid School Leaders Measure
Program Success? Experimental Evidence from a National Sample of Hybrid Schools. Journal
of School Choice, 19(2).
- Thompson, J., Lee, M. H., & Wearne, E. (2024). Are Hybrid Schoolers Reluctant to Participate in Private School Choice Programs? Experimental Evidence from a National Sample of Hybrid School Leaders. Journal of School Choice, 18(4), 653–667.
- E. Wearne, J Thompson (2023). “Comparing Commute Distances Between Hybrid and Conventional Schools.” Journal of School Choice.
- Wearne, E. (2021). “Hybrid Homeschools: Organization, Regulatory Environments and Reactions to COVID-19.” Journal of Pedagogy, 12(1) 99-118.
- Wearne, E. (2019). “Parent and administrator perceptions of hybrid homeschools.” Catholic Social Science Review, Vol. 24, pp. 177-193.
- Wearne, E. (2019). “A Survey of families in a charter hybrid homeschool.” Peabody Journal of Education, 94(3), pp. 297-311.
- Wearne, E. (2017). “University-model schools ®: A survey of families in five states.” Home School Researcher, 33(3), 2-11.
- Wearne, E. (2016). “A descriptive survey of why parents choose hybrid homeschools.” Journal of School Choice, 10(3), 364-380.

